LAFFERTY, GEORGE DYLAN LAFFERTY, PERMANENT TRUSTEE IN SEQUESTRATION OF THE ESTATE OF MARIAM VAN OVERWAELE AGAINST (FIRST) GEORGE AMIL AND (SECOND) MARIAM AMIL OR VAN OVERWAELE, ALSO KNOWN AS MARIAN VAN OVERWAELE [2018] ScotCS CSOH_122 (19 December 2018)
The pursuer demonstrated a prima facie case for interdict as the disposition was granted during subsisting sequestration and inhibition, and there was a reasonable apprehension that the defenders would attempt to dispose of or burden the property, prejudicing the trustee's ability to realise value for creditors. The balance of convenience favoured the pursuer, as no prejudice to the defenders was identified, while prejudice to the trustee was clear if further dealings occurred.
- Citation
- [2018] ScotCS CSOH_122
- Parties
- Pursuer: George Dylan Lafferty, Permanent Trustee in Sequestration of the Estate of Mariam Van Overwaele; First Defender: George Amil; Second Defender: Mariam Amil or Van Overwaele, also known as Marian Van Overwaele
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Motion for Interim Interdict Before Calling
- Outcome
- Interim interdict granted in favour of the pursuer.
- Legal Topics
- Sequestration, Interim Interdict, Reduction of Disposition, Statutory Inhibition, Trustee Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Dylan Lafferty, Permanent Trustee in Sequestration of the Estate of Mariam Van Overwaele
Pursuer
George Amil
First Defender
Mariam Amil or Van Overwaele, also known as Marian Van Overwaele
Second Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Motion for Interim Interdict Before Calling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interim interdict should be granted to prevent defenders from disposing of, leasing, mortgaging, burdening or otherwise dealing with the heritable subjects vested in the trustee.
- 2 Whether the disposition and purported liferent granted by the second defender during sequestration are valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer demonstrated a prima facie case for interdict as the disposition was granted during subsisting sequestration and inhibition, and there was a reasonable apprehension that the defenders would attempt to dispose of or burden the property, prejudicing the trustee's ability to realise value for creditors. The balance of convenience favoured the pursuer, as no prejudice to the defenders was identified, while prejudice to the trustee was clear if further dealings occurred.
Court Disposition
Interim interdict granted in favour of the pursuer.
Orders
- Interim interdict granted against both defenders from disponing, leasing, mortgaging, burdening or otherwise dealing with the subjects.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment