Morrison v HM Revenue and Customs [2014] ScotCS CSIH_113 (23 December 2014)
The appellant's payment in settlement of the action constituted a contingent liability in respect of representations made on the disposal of his shares, falling within section 49(1)(c) of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. The statutory language does not require the liability to be directly related to the value of the consideration or to depend on the capacity in which the representation was made. The payment reduced the gain realised on disposal, and the requirements for adjustment under section 49(2) were met.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotCS CSIH_113
- Parties
- Appellant: Sir Fraser Morrison; Respondents: The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Upper Tribunal Tax and Chancery Chamber / Appeal Judgment and Remittal to First Tier Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; case remitted to First Tier Tribunal for quantification of the settlement payment attributable to the relevant contingent liability.
- Legal Topics
- Capital Gains Tax, Contingent Liability, Statutory Interpretation, Tax Computation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sir Fraser Morrison
Appellant
The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Upper Tribunal Tax and Chancery Chamber / Appeal Judgment and Remittal to First Tier Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a settlement payment made by the appellant was a contingent liability in respect of representations made on a disposal by way of sale of shares within the meaning of section 49(1)(c) of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992, entitling the appellant to an adjustment of capital gains tax liability under section 49(2).
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's payment in settlement of the action constituted a contingent liability in respect of representations made on the disposal of his shares, falling within section 49(1)(c) of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. The statutory language does not require the liability to be directly related to the value of the consideration or to depend on the capacity in which the representation was made. The payment reduced the gain realised on disposal, and the requirements for adjustment under section 49(2) were met.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; case remitted to First Tier Tribunal for quantification of the settlement payment attributable to the relevant contingent liability.
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Case remitted to the First Tier Tribunal to determine what part of the £12 million settlement payment was attributable to representations giving rise to the contingent liability under section 49(1)(c).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment