Aitchison & Sons, Ltd v. M'Ewan [1903] ScotLR 40_249 (08 January 1903)
Diligence for recovery of company books granted solely on the ground that they may be material to the question of the amount of damages; not to be used for any other purpose.
- Citation
- [1903] ScotLR 40_249
- Parties
- Pursuer: Aitchison & Sons, Limited; Defender: John M'Ewan and others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 January 1903
- Procedural Posture
- Action for Damages (slander) / Interlocutory Motion for Diligence for Recovery of Documents
- Outcome
- diligence granted for recovery of documents
- Legal Topics
- Slander, Judicial Liquidation, Diligence for Recovery of Documents, Damages Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Aitchison & Sons, Limited
Pursuer
John M'Ewan and others
Defender
Procedural Posture
Action for Damages (slander) / Interlocutory Motion for Diligence for Recovery of Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defenders are entitled to recover company books for purposes other than damages
- 2 Relevance of company books to the issue of damages in a slander action
Ratio Decidendi
Diligence for recovery of company books granted solely on the ground that they may be material to the question of the amount of damages; not to be used for any other purpose.
Court Disposition
diligence granted for recovery of documents
Orders
- Grant diligence against havers at the instance of the defenders for recovery of documents in specification No. 31 of process (as amended at the Bar)
- Grant commission to Mr W. Æ. Mackintosh, advocate, to take oaths and examinations of havers and receive exhibits and productions, to be reported quam primum
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment