West v. Mackenzie [1917] ScotLR 456 (25 May 1917)
The pursuer failed to prove that the defender acted maliciously or without probable cause in writing to the police; the evidence did not support the jury's finding of malice, and the defender's conduct was justified by the circumstances. The verdict was contrary to evidence and must be set aside, and judgment entered for the defender.
- Citation
- [1917] ScotLR 456
- Parties
- Pursuer: Mrs Mary West; Defender: William Mackenzie
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 1917
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal on Motion for New Trial Following Jury Verdict
- Outcome
- verdict set aside; defender assoilzied (absolved)
- Legal Topics
- Slander, Malice, Probable Cause, Privilege, Reparation, Jury Verdicts, Setting Aside Verdicts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Mary West
Pursuer
William Mackenzie
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal on Motion for New Trial Following Jury Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defender acted maliciously and without probable cause in instructing a police constable to detain the pursuer for leaving without paying a hotel bill
- 2 Whether the jury's verdict for the pursuer was contrary to the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer failed to prove that the defender acted maliciously or without probable cause in writing to the police; the evidence did not support the jury's finding of malice, and the defender's conduct was justified by the circumstances. The verdict was contrary to evidence and must be set aside, and judgment entered for the defender.
Court Disposition
verdict set aside; defender assoilzied (absolved)
Orders
- Rule made absolute; verdict set aside; defender assoilzied from the conclusions of the action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment