Smith & Anor v Messrs Lindsay & Kirk & Ors [2001] ScotCS 51 (7 March 2001)
On balance, the pursuers did instruct Mr Anderson to advise on and raise an action against Craig Cameron. Failure to do so within the contractual time limit constituted breach of contract/negligence. The lost claim had measurable value, but not one bound to succeed; its reasonable settlement value was £5,000.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 51
- Parties
- Pursuer: James Smith; Pursuer: Mrs Patricia Smith; Defender: Messrs Lindsay and Kirk; Defender: Robert Anderson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Proof
- Outcome
- judgment for pursuers
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor Negligence, Loss of Chance, Breach of Contract, Damages Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Smith
Pursuer
Mrs Patricia Smith
Pursuer
Messrs Lindsay and Kirk
Defender
Robert Anderson
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Anderson was instructed to raise an action against Mr Craig Cameron within the contractual time limit
- 2 Whether failure to raise such action constituted breach of contract/negligence
- 3 Assessment of the value of the lost claim
Ratio Decidendi
On balance, the pursuers did instruct Mr Anderson to advise on and raise an action against Craig Cameron. Failure to do so within the contractual time limit constituted breach of contract/negligence. The lost claim had measurable value, but not one bound to succeed; its reasonable settlement value was £5,000.
Court Disposition
judgment for pursuers
Orders
- Repel first, third and fourth pleas-in-law for defenders
- Sustain first plea-in-law for pursuers
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment