Brown v Ackerman [2001] ScotCS 153 (15 June 2001)

The defender's pleadings do not state a relevant defence to the pursuers' claim for payment of the taxed account, as alleged failures to do further work do not affect entitlement to payment for work actually done, and no counterclaim for damages or overcharging is made.

Citation: [2001] ScotCS 153
Parties: Pursuer: Digby Brown; Defender: Laura Ackerman
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judgment Date: 15 June 2001
Procedural Posture: Civil / Procedure Roll Hearing; Judgment on Relevancy of Defences
Outcome: Defences repelled; decree granted for pursuers for £8416.75 with interest; question of expenses reserved.
Legal Topics: Solicitor's Fees, Taxation of Account, Relevancy of Defences, Professional Negligence (alleged)

Civil Procedure Contract Law Legal Profession Solicitor's Fees Taxation of Account Relevancy of Defences Professional Negligence (alleged)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4

Parties

Digby Brown

Pursuer

Laura Ackerman

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Procedure Roll Hearing; Judgment on Relevancy of Defences

Legal Issues

1 Whether the defender has stated a relevant and specific defence to the pursuers' claim for payment of solicitors' fees and outlays
2 Whether alleged failures by the pursuers to carry out further work affect their entitlement to payment for work done

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Defences repelled; decree granted for pursuers for £8416.75 with interest; question of expenses reserved.

Orders

Sustain pursuers' second plea-in-law
Repel defences