CHALMERS v MACHIN [2017] ScotSC 29 (09 May 2017)
The defender, as heir of provision under the special destination, is personally liable to the trustee for the deceased’s debts subsisting at the date of death, to the extent of the value of the inherited one-half share, regardless of whether the share formed part of the sequestrated estate. The defender’s averments denying such liability are irrelevant and excluded from probation. The extent of the deceased’s debts at death remains a factual issue for proof.
- Citation
- [2017] ScotSC 29
- Parties
- Pursuer: Gordon Chalmers as trustee of the sequestrated estate of the late Colin Machin; Defender: Maria Jennifer Machin
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Relevancy and Exclusion From Probation; Proof Allowed on Remaining Factual Issues
- Outcome
- Defender’s preliminary pleas repelled; pursuer’s plea sustained in part; proof allowed on remaining issues; expenses reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Special Destination, Heir of Provision, Liability for Deceased's Debts, Sequestration, Creditors' Rights, Prescription of Debts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gordon Chalmers as trustee of the sequestrated estate of the late Colin Machin
Pursuer
Maria Jennifer Machin
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Relevancy and Exclusion From Probation; Proof Allowed on Remaining Factual Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defender, as heir of provision under a special destination, is personally liable for the deceased's debts to the extent of the value of the inherited share
- 2 Whether the deceased's one-half pro indiviso share formed part of his estate at death or at sequestration
- 3 Whether any debts transferred to the defender upon acquisition of the deceased's share
Ratio Decidendi
The defender, as heir of provision under the special destination, is personally liable to the trustee for the deceased’s debts subsisting at the date of death, to the extent of the value of the inherited one-half share, regardless of whether the share formed part of the sequestrated estate. The defender’s averments denying such liability are irrelevant and excluded from probation. The extent of the deceased’s debts at death remains a factual issue for proof.
Court Disposition
Defender’s preliminary pleas repelled; pursuer’s plea sustained in part; proof allowed on remaining issues; expenses reserved.
Orders
- Repels defender’s pleas-in-law numbers 5, 6 and 7
- Sustains in part pursuer’s plea-in-law number 3 to exclude specified averments from probation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment