Maclean v. Maclean [1908] ScotLR 672 (23 May 1908)
The legacy was a special legacy of a specific sum of £300 which was in the pursuer's hands at the date of the will; when the sum was repaid to the testatrix and merged with her general estate, the subject of the bequest ceased to exist, and the legacy was adeemed.
- Citation
- [1908] ScotLR 672
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Alexander MacLean; Defender/reclaimer: Flora MacLean
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Dispute / Appeal (reclaiming Note) in the Inner House, Second Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Lord Ordinary's finding that the legacy was not adeemed recalled; legacy held to be adeemed.
- Legal Topics
- Special Legacy, Ademption, Will Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexander MacLean
Pursuer/respondent
Flora MacLean
Defender/reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Succession Dispute / Appeal (reclaiming Note) in the Inner House, Second Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the £300 legacy to the pursuer was a special (specific) legacy or a general legacy
- 2 Whether the legacy was adeemed when the sum was repaid to the testatrix and merged with her general estate
Ratio Decidendi
The legacy was a special legacy of a specific sum of £300 which was in the pursuer's hands at the date of the will; when the sum was repaid to the testatrix and merged with her general estate, the subject of the bequest ceased to exist, and the legacy was adeemed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Lord Ordinary's finding that the legacy was not adeemed recalled; legacy held to be adeemed.
Orders
- Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled insofar as it found the legacy not adeemed
- Fifth plea-in-law for the defender sustained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment