SRS v PROCURATOR FISCAL [2016] ScotSAC Crim 3 (10 February 2016)
The court held that the sheriff's decision to refuse bail was justified based on the risk factors presented and the nature of the alleged offence.
- Citation
- [2016] ScotSAC Crim 3
- Parties
- Appellant: SRS; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
SRS
Appellant
Procurator Fiscal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 whether bail should be granted or refused
- 2 whether the sheriff erred in refusing bail
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the sheriff's decision to refuse bail was justified based on the risk factors presented and the nature of the alleged offence.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- bail refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment