Don Francesco v. De Meo [1907] ScotLR 13 (18 October 1907)
The document in question was not the instrument under which the sale took place but was merely an agreement as to the mode of payment and the non-compete obligation; therefore, it was sufficiently stamped with a sixpenny agreement stamp and did not require an ad valorem stamp.
- Citation
- [1907] ScotLR 13
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Francesco Don Francesco; Defender/appellant: Onofrio De Meo
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; decree for payment affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Stamp Duty, Conveyance on Sale, Agreement Enforceability, Penalty Clause, Non Compete Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francesco Don Francesco
Pursuer/respondent
Onofrio De Meo
Defender/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the document evidencing the agreement required an ad valorem stamp under the Stamp Act 1891
- 2 Whether the document constituted a conveyance on sale or a mere agreement as to payment and non-compete
- 3 Whether the court should refuse to admit the document in evidence due to insufficient stamping
Ratio Decidendi
The document in question was not the instrument under which the sale took place but was merely an agreement as to the mode of payment and the non-compete obligation; therefore, it was sufficiently stamped with a sixpenny agreement stamp and did not require an ad valorem stamp.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; decree for payment affirmed
Orders
- Defender's appeal dismissed
- Defender ordained to pay the sum sued for (£150) with interest
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment