JUDGMENT OF SHERIFF PHILIP MANN IN CAUSA UK ACORN FINANCE Ltd AGAINST CHARLES ALEXANDER SMITH [2014] ScotSC 61 (16 July 2014)
The pursuer, as creditor in the standard security, retains statutory rights of enforcement under the Conveyancing and Feudal Reform (Scotland) Act 1970, even after assignation of the personal obligation to a third party. The statutory right is distinct from the common law right, and the pursuer has title and interest to sue for remedies under the standard security, including serving a calling up notice and seeking ejection.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotSC 61
- Parties
- Pursuer: UK Acorn Finance Limited; Defender: Charles Alexander Smith
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Preliminary Plea
- Outcome
- Defender's preliminary plea number 1 repelled; proof before answer allowed on preliminary plea number 2; cause continued for procedural hearing; expenses reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Standard Security, Title to Sue, Assignation of Rights, Heritable Creditor Remedies, Calling Up Notice, Ejection From Security Subjects
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UK Acorn Finance Limited
Pursuer
Charles Alexander Smith
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Preliminary Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer retains title to sue for enforcement of a standard security after assignation of the underlying personal obligation to a third party
- 2 Whether the pursuer is entitled to serve a calling up notice and seek ejection under the Heritable Securities (Scotland) Act 1894
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer, as creditor in the standard security, retains statutory rights of enforcement under the Conveyancing and Feudal Reform (Scotland) Act 1970, even after assignation of the personal obligation to a third party. The statutory right is distinct from the common law right, and the pursuer has title and interest to sue for remedies under the standard security, including serving a calling up notice and seeking ejection.
Court Disposition
Defender's preliminary plea number 1 repelled; proof before answer allowed on preliminary plea number 2; cause continued for procedural hearing; expenses reserved.
Orders
- Repels defender’s preliminary plea number 1 (no title to sue)
- Allows proof before answer on defender’s preliminary plea number 2
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment