Stark'S Trustees v. Cooper's Trustees [1900] ScotLR 37_944 (20 July 1900)

Stark'S Trustees v. Cooper's Trustees [1900] ScotLR 37_944 (20 July 1900)

The Sheriff Court had jurisdiction as the action involved heritable right or title. The wall was legally a mutual gable, and its demolition was ordered by judicial authority due to decay, not through fault of the pursuers. The defenders, as joint owners, having used the rebuilt wall, are liable for half the cost of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1900] ScotLR 37_944
Parties
Appellant: Stark's Trustees; Respondent: Cooper's Trustees
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
20 July 1900
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Mutual Gable, Heritable Right or Title, Jurisdiction, Cost Sharing, Common Property, Right of Support
Property Law Civil Procedure Mutual Gable Heritable Right or Title Jurisdiction Cost Sharing Common Property Right of Support

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stark's Trustees

Appellant

Cooper's Trustees

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Sheriff Court had jurisdiction over the action involving foreign-domiciled trustees owning property in Scotland
  2. 2 Whether the wall in question was a mutual gable and thus subject to cost sharing
  3. 3 Whether the pursuers were entitled to reimbursement for half the cost of rebuilding the mutual wall

Ratio Decidendi

The Sheriff Court had jurisdiction as the action involved heritable right or title. The wall was legally a mutual gable, and its demolition was ordered by judicial authority due to decay, not through fault of the pursuers. The defenders, as joint owners, having used the rebuilt wall, are liable for half the cost of reconstruction to the height of their building.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Affirmed interlocutors of Sheriff-Substitute dated 27 July 1898 and Sheriff dated 20 October 1898
  • Recalled interlocutors of Sheriff-Substitute dated 30 March 1899 and Sheriff dated 26 July 1899