Steven Blair Milligan against Jaguar Land Rover Automotive Plc (Court of Session) [2024] CSOH 96 (29 October 2024)
The applicant is a suitable representative party, meeting all requirements under Rule 26A.7, including independence, fairness, and financial resources. The group claims raise common issues suitable for group proceedings, a prima facie case is established, group proceedings are more efficient than individual claims, and the claims have real prospects of success. Permission is granted for group proceedings and for the applicant to act as representative party.
- Citation
- [2024] CSOH 96
- Parties
- Applicant: Steven Blair Milligan; First Defender: Jaguar Land Rover Automotive Plc; Second Defender: Jaguar Land Rover Limited; Third Defender: CA Auto Finance UK Limited; Fourth Defender: Black Horse Limited; Fifth Defender: Lex Autolease Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Group Proceedings Application / Permission and Representative Party Appointment
- Outcome
- Permission granted for group proceedings; applicant authorised as representative party.
- Legal Topics
- Group Proceedings, Representative Party, Nox Emissions, Vehicle Emissions Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven Blair Milligan
Applicant
Jaguar Land Rover Automotive Plc
First Defender
Jaguar Land Rover Limited
Second Defender
CA Auto Finance UK Limited
Third Defender
Black Horse Limited
Fourth Defender
Lex Autolease Limited
Fifth Defender
Procedural Posture
Group Proceedings Application / Permission and Representative Party Appointment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is a suitable representative party under Rule 26A.7
- 2 Whether permission should be granted to bring group proceedings under section 20 of the Civil Litigation (Expenses and Group Proceedings) (Scotland) Act 2018 and Rule 26A.11
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is a suitable representative party, meeting all requirements under Rule 26A.7, including independence, fairness, and financial resources. The group claims raise common issues suitable for group proceedings, a prima facie case is established, group proceedings are more efficient than individual claims, and the claims have real prospects of success. Permission is granted for group proceedings and for the applicant to act as representative party.
Court Disposition
Permission granted for group proceedings; applicant authorised as representative party.
Orders
- Applicant authorised as representative party in GP2/24.
- Permission granted to bring group proceedings in GP3/24.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment