THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF SCOTLAND v. STEVEN CAMERON KAY FOR SEQUESTRATION OF THE ESTATES OF A JUDICIAL FACTOR [2001] ScotHC 72 (27th July, 2001)

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF SCOTLAND v. STEVEN CAMERON KAY FOR SEQUESTRATION OF THE ESTATES OF A JUDICIAL FACTOR [2001] ScotHC 72 (27th July, 2001)

There was no legal or factual basis for sequestration or appointment of a judicial factor over the respondent's estate; the petitioners had no interest in the estate, the respondent was not insolvent, and ordinary remedies were available. The interim orders were incompetent and unreasonable.

Citation
[2001] ScotHC 72
Parties
Petitioner: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland; Respondent: Steven Cameron Kay
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Procedural Posture
Petition for Sequestration and Appointment of Judicial Factor / Motion to Recall Interim Orders
Outcome
interim orders recalled
Legal Topics
Appointment of Judicial Factor, Sequestration of Estates, Disciplinary Proceedings, Interim Orders, Common Law Remedies
Professional Discipline Insolvency Judicial Management Appointment of Judicial Factor Sequestration of Estates Disciplinary Proceedings Interim Orders Common Law Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland

Petitioner

Steven Cameron Kay

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition for Sequestration and Appointment of Judicial Factor / Motion to Recall Interim Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there is a legal basis for appointing a judicial factor over the respondent's estate
  2. 2 Whether sequestration of the respondent's estate is competent and appropriate in the circumstances
  3. 3 Whether interim orders should have been granted without intimation to the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

There was no legal or factual basis for sequestration or appointment of a judicial factor over the respondent's estate; the petitioners had no interest in the estate, the respondent was not insolvent, and ordinary remedies were available. The interim orders were incompetent and unreasonable.

Court Disposition

interim orders recalled

Orders

  • Recall of interim sequestration and appointment of judicial factor