Workflo Solutions (Scotland) LTD against Strathmore Property LTD (Sheriff Court Civil) [2026] SCLIV 13 (04 December 2025)

Workflo Solutions (Scotland) LTD against Strathmore Property LTD (Sheriff Court Civil) [2026] SCLIV 13 (04 December 2025)

The claimants failed to prove that they provided the network support (Netflo) or Secureflo services for which they sought to charge, and the relevant contract terms, being in small print and not discussed, were construed contra proferentem. The claimants were in material breach for not providing contracted services and could not enforce payment of the disputed charges or administration fees.

Citation
[2026] SCLIV 13
Parties
Claimant: Workflo Solutions (Scotland) Limited; Respondent: Strathmore Property Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
04 December 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim (contract) / Judgment After Evidential Hearing
Outcome
claim dismissed; absolvitor granted to respondents
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Contract Terms, Contra Proferentem, Supply of Goods and Services, Hidden Charges, Performance of Contractual Obligations
Contract Law Commercial Law Interpretation of Contract Terms Contra Proferentem Supply of Goods and Services Hidden Charges Performance of Contractual Obligations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Workflo Solutions (Scotland) Limited

Claimant

Strathmore Property Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Claim (contract) / Judgment After Evidential Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the goods supplied conformed to contractual specification
  2. 2 Whether additional charges (Netflo and Secureflo) were contractually due
  3. 3 Whether claimants provided services to contractual standard

Ratio Decidendi

The claimants failed to prove that they provided the network support (Netflo) or Secureflo services for which they sought to charge, and the relevant contract terms, being in small print and not discussed, were construed contra proferentem. The claimants were in material breach for not providing contracted services and could not enforce payment of the disputed charges or administration fees.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed; absolvitor granted to respondents

Orders

  • No sums due to claimants under the contract for Netflo, Secureflo, or administration fees
  • No award of expenses to or by either party