Friends Provident Life And Pensions Ltd v. McGuinness [2005] ScotCS CSOH_72 (03 June 2005)
Initially, summary decree was granted as the defender's pleadings disclosed no relevant defence. Upon later submissions, the court found that, had the new grounds been presented earlier, summary decree would not have been appropriate as arguable defences existed.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotCS CSOH_72
- Parties
- Pursuer: Friends Provident Life & Pensions Limited; Defender: John McGuinness
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Motion for Summary Decree and Motion for Leave to Reclaim
- Outcome
- Leave to reclaim granted; summary decree interlocutor open to appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Decree, Condictio Indebiti, Personal Bar, Equitable Remedies, Repetition of Payment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Friends Provident Life & Pensions Limited
Pursuer
John McGuinness
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Motion for Summary Decree and Motion for Leave to Reclaim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary decree should be granted for repayment of £627,408.31 paid in error
- 2 Whether the defender has a stateable defence to the action based on condictio indebiti, personal bar, change of position, or equity
Ratio Decidendi
Initially, summary decree was granted as the defender's pleadings disclosed no relevant defence. Upon later submissions, the court found that, had the new grounds been presented earlier, summary decree would not have been appropriate as arguable defences existed.
Court Disposition
Leave to reclaim granted; summary decree interlocutor open to appeal.
Orders
- Leave to reclaim the interlocutor of 24 March 2005 is granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment