Robson v. Hawick School Board [1900] ScotLR 37_306 (19 January 1900)
The pursuer's appointment as interim teacher was for a fixed term of three months, with clear notice of termination, and thus not subject to statutory dismissal procedures for regular teachers. She received all salary due under the contract. The school board acted within its statutory powers in suspending her, and no action for damages lies for such suspension, even if malice is alleged. The school board is not vicariously liable for the clerk's alleged assault, as it was outside the scope of his employment. Claims for assault and wrongful imprisonment cannot proceed under the poor's roll unless the reporters have found probable cause for those claims.
- Citation
- [1900] ScotLR 37_306
- Parties
- Pursuer: Miss Jane Robson; Defender: Hawick School Board; Defender: Chairman of the School Board
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Teacher Appointment, Interim Employment, Wrongful Dismissal, Suspension of Teacher, Malice, Damages for Defamation, Assault by Employee, Scope of Employment, Poor's Roll Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss Jane Robson
Pursuer
Hawick School Board
Defender
Chairman of the School Board
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interim teacher's appointment for a fixed period is subject to statutory dismissal procedures under the Education (Scotland) Act 1872 and Public Schools (Scotland) Teachers Act 1882.
- 2 Whether suspension of a teacher by a school board gives rise to a claim for damages, especially where malice is alleged.
- 3 Whether the school board is vicariously liable for assault committed by its clerk against a teacher.
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer's appointment as interim teacher was for a fixed term of three months, with clear notice of termination, and thus not subject to statutory dismissal procedures for regular teachers. She received all salary due under the contract. The school board acted within its statutory powers in suspending her, and no action for damages lies for such suspension, even if malice is alleged. The school board is not vicariously liable for the clerk's alleged assault, as it was outside the scope of his employment. Claims for assault and wrongful imprisonment cannot proceed under the poor's roll unless the reporters have found probable cause for those claims.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary affirmed.
Orders
- Action against the School Board dismissed as irrelevant.
- Further procedure sisted (stayed) to allow pursuer to apply for poor's roll admission for the third conclusion (assault and wrongful imprisonment).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment