Davidson v. Stuart [1918] ScotLR 27 (05 November 1918)
A heritor may competently surrender his valued teind without reducing the final decree of locality where there is no free teind in the parish. The surrender is valid if effected by a deed specifying the amount of valued teind surrendered. The stipend for the relevant year, though vested in the minister, is limited to the value of the teinds and is affected by the surrender if made before the stipend amount is fixed.
- Citation
- [1918] ScotLR 27
- Parties
- Pursuer: John Davidson; Defender: Reverend John Stuart
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 1918
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial and Appeal
- Outcome
- Decree granted in favour of the pursuer (Davidson) in terms of the second or alternative conclusion of the summons, with interdict corresponding thereto, as varied to refer to the date of the formal deed of surrender (12 March 1917).
- Legal Topics
- Teinds, Stipend, Surrender of Teinds, Decree of Locality, Valuation of Teinds, Rectification of Locality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Davidson
Pursuer
Reverend John Stuart
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial and Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a heritor can surrender valued teinds without reducing the final decree of locality when there is no free teind in the parish.
- 2 Whether the surrender of teinds was validly effected by the deed of surrender.
- 3 Whether the stipend for crop and year 1916 vested in the minister is affected by the surrender.
Ratio Decidendi
A heritor may competently surrender his valued teind without reducing the final decree of locality where there is no free teind in the parish. The surrender is valid if effected by a deed specifying the amount of valued teind surrendered. The stipend for the relevant year, though vested in the minister, is limited to the value of the teinds and is affected by the surrender if made before the stipend amount is fixed.
Court Disposition
Decree granted in favour of the pursuer (Davidson) in terms of the second or alternative conclusion of the summons, with interdict corresponding thereto, as varied to refer to the date of the formal deed of surrender (12 March 1917).
Orders
- Declarator that the pursuer has validly surrendered the teinds at £96 per annum as at 12 March 1917.
- Interdict prohibiting the defender from charging the pursuer for stipend in excess of £96 per annum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment