Easson's Trustees v. Mailer [1901] ScotLR 38_700 (14 June 1901)
The Court held that the donation of £500 to the defender was proved and that, as a successful defender and residuary legatee, no part of the litigation expenses should be paid out of her share of the residue.
- Citation
- [1901] ScotLR 38_700
- Parties
- Pursuers and Respondents: William Hazell and another, testamentary trustees of Thomas Easson, Dundee; Defender and Reclaimer: Mary Mailer
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 1901
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (inner House, Second Division)
- Outcome
- Defender assoilzied (absolved); entitled to expenses; no expenses to be paid out of her share of residue.
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Trusts, Donation Inter Vivos, Expenses of Litigation, Distribution of Residue
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Hazell and another, testamentary trustees of Thomas Easson, Dundee
Pursuers and Respondents
Mary Mailer
Defender and Reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (inner House, Second Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the £500 received by the defender was a donation from the testator or part of the estate
- 2 Whether the defender, as a residuary legatee, should have her share of the residue reduced by litigation expenses
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the donation of £500 to the defender was proved and that, as a successful defender and residuary legatee, no part of the litigation expenses should be paid out of her share of the residue.
Court Disposition
Defender assoilzied (absolved); entitled to expenses; no expenses to be paid out of her share of residue.
Orders
- Recal the interlocutor reclaimed against
- Assoilzie the defender
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment