Lowrie's JF v McMillan [1972] ScotCS CSOH_2 (03 March 1972)
The three writings dated 17th September 1964, found together and forming a coherent testamentary scheme, are valid and effectual as the deceased's will. The deceased's initials at the end of the third writing, in the circumstances, are sufficient authentication to satisfy the requirement of subscription.
- Citation
- [1972] ScotCS CSOH_2
- Parties
- Pursuer: Lowrie's Judicial Factor; Defender: M'Millan's Executrix; Defender: Lord Advocate (Crown as ultimus haeres)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 1972
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / First Instance
- Outcome
- The three writings of 17th September 1964 constitute the only valid and effectual testamentary writings of the deceased.
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Writings, Holograph Wills, Authentication of Wills, Revocation of Wills
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lowrie's Judicial Factor
Pursuer
M'Millan's Executrix
Defender
Lord Advocate (Crown as ultimus haeres)
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Are the three holograph writings of 17th September 1964 testamentary in character?
- 2 Can the three writings be read together as one document?
- 3 Were the writings intended to govern the disposal of the deceased's estate?
Ratio Decidendi
The three writings dated 17th September 1964, found together and forming a coherent testamentary scheme, are valid and effectual as the deceased's will. The deceased's initials at the end of the third writing, in the circumstances, are sufficient authentication to satisfy the requirement of subscription.
Court Disposition
The three writings of 17th September 1964 constitute the only valid and effectual testamentary writings of the deceased.
Orders
- Pleas in law for the Lord Advocate (ultimus haeres) repelled.
- Pleas in law for remaining claimants sustained.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment