RECLAIMING MOTION BY FOR WOMEN SCOTLAND LIMITED AGAINST THE LORD ADVOCATE AND OTHERS [2022] ScotCS CSIH_4 (18 February 2022)
The definition of 'woman' in section 2 of the 2018 Act unlawfully conflates the protected characteristics of sex and gender reassignment, and qualifies the latter by protecting only those living as women. This impinges on the nature of protected characteristics, which is a reserved matter. The Scottish Parliament may legislate for inclusion of persons with protected characteristics on public boards, but cannot redefine or combine those characteristics. Accordingly, sections 2 and 11 of the 2018 Act are outwith legislative competence.
- Citation
- [2022] ScotCS CSIH_4
- Parties
- Petitioners and Reclaimers: For Women Scotland Limited; Respondent: The Lord Advocate; Respondent: The Scottish Ministers; Intervener: The Equality Network
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (reclaiming Motion) / Appeal (inner House, Court of Session)
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion allowed; sections 2 and 11 of the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018 held to be outwith legislative competence.
- Legal Topics
- Legislative Competence, Protected Characteristics, Positive Action, Gender Representation, Devolution, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
For Women Scotland Limited
Petitioners and Reclaimers
The Lord Advocate
Respondent
The Scottish Ministers
Respondent
The Equality Network
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (reclaiming Motion) / Appeal (inner House, Court of Session)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sections 2 and 11 of the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018 are within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament
- 2 Whether the definition of 'woman' in the Act unlawfully conflates protected characteristics of sex and gender reassignment
- 3 Whether the Act unlawfully modifies or disapplies provisions of the Equality Act 2010
Ratio Decidendi
The definition of 'woman' in section 2 of the 2018 Act unlawfully conflates the protected characteristics of sex and gender reassignment, and qualifies the latter by protecting only those living as women. This impinges on the nature of protected characteristics, which is a reserved matter. The Scottish Parliament may legislate for inclusion of persons with protected characteristics on public boards, but cannot redefine or combine those characteristics. Accordingly, sections 2 and 11 of the 2018 Act are outwith legislative competence.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion allowed; sections 2 and 11 of the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018 held to be outwith legislative competence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment