CSC Braehead Leisure Ltd & Anor v. Laing O'Rourke Scotland Ltd & Anor [2008] ScotCS CSOH_93 (20 June 2008)

CSC Braehead Leisure Ltd & Anor v. Laing O'Rourke Scotland Ltd & Anor [2008] ScotCS CSOH_93 (20 June 2008)

The interests of justice require allowance of third party notices and counterclaim, as refusal would result in further litigation, duplication of evidence, risk of inconsistent decisions, and unfairness to parties with an interest in the dispute, outweighing the delay and complexity introduced.

Citation
[2008] ScotCS CSOH_93
Parties
Pursuer: CSC Braehead Leisure Limited; Pursuer: Capital & Regional (Braehead) Limited; Defender: Laing O'Rourke Scotland Limited; Defender: Laing O'Rourke PLC
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
20 June 2008
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Defenders' motions granted
Legal Topics
Third Party Procedure, Counterclaim, Delay, Interests of Justice, Building Contract, Damages, Contribution, Relief, Indemnity
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Construction Law Third Party Procedure Counterclaim Delay Interests of Justice Building Contract +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CSC Braehead Leisure Limited

Pursuer

Capital & Regional (Braehead) Limited

Pursuer

Laing O'Rourke Scotland Limited

Defender

Laing O'Rourke PLC

Defender

Procedural Posture

Commercial Action / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether third party notices should be allowed in a commercial action
  2. 2 Whether a counterclaim should be allowed to be received
  3. 3 Balancing speedy resolution with interests of justice

Ratio Decidendi

The interests of justice require allowance of third party notices and counterclaim, as refusal would result in further litigation, duplication of evidence, risk of inconsistent decisions, and unfairness to parties with an interest in the dispute, outweighing the delay and complexity introduced.

Court Disposition

Defenders' motions granted

Orders

  • Warrant to serve third party notices on four additional parties
  • Counterclaim allowed to be received