M'Vey v. William Dixon Ltd [1910] ScotLR 463 (18 March 1910)
The Sheriff-Substitute was entitled to exercise procedural discretion and was not bound by statute to grant immediate registration of the memorandum of agreement when a contemporaneous application for arbitration was pending; the proper procedure required the employer to lodge a minute of objection, but the absence of such did not prejudice the workman nor invalidate the Sheriff's decision to await the outcome of the proof.
- Citation
- [1910] ScotLR 463
- Parties
- Appellant: Thomas M'Vey; Respondent: William Dixon Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Stated Case From Sheriff Court / Judgment on Legal Question Regarding Registration of Memorandum Under Workmen's Compensation Act 1906
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; question of law answered in the negative.
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Registration of Agreement, Procedural Discretion, Recording Memorandum, Employer's Objection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas M'Vey
Appellant
William Dixon Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Stated Case From Sheriff Court / Judgment on Legal Question Regarding Registration of Memorandum Under Workmen's Compensation Act 1906
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sheriff-Substitute was bound by statute to grant warrant to register the memorandum of agreement without awaiting the result of the proof in the counter application for arbitration
Ratio Decidendi
The Sheriff-Substitute was entitled to exercise procedural discretion and was not bound by statute to grant immediate registration of the memorandum of agreement when a contemporaneous application for arbitration was pending; the proper procedure required the employer to lodge a minute of objection, but the absence of such did not prejudice the workman nor invalidate the Sheriff's decision to await the outcome of the proof.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; question of law answered in the negative.
Orders
- The Sheriff-Substitute was not bound to grant warrant to register the memorandum forthwith and could await the result of the proof in the counter application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment