Black Horse LTD against D (Court of Session) [2025] SCHAM 13 (04 February 2025)
It is not just to grant a time order given the defender's persistent default, speculative financial evidence, excessive extension required to the contract, and the risk of further depreciation of the vehicle; decree for delivery is granted and time order refused.
- Citation
- [2025] SCHAM 13
- Parties
- Pursuer: Black Horse Limited; Defender: D
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Hire Purchase Enforcement / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- decree granted for delivery of vehicle; application for time order refused; expenses awarded against defender
- Legal Topics
- Time Orders, Hire Purchase Agreements, Default and Termination, Repossession, Variation of Contract Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Black Horse Limited
Pursuer
D
Defender
Procedural Posture
Hire Purchase Enforcement / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is just to grant a time order under section 129 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 to prevent enforcement of a hire purchase agreement
- 2 Whether the court has power to vary contractual interest rates under sections 129 and 136 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974
Ratio Decidendi
It is not just to grant a time order given the defender's persistent default, speculative financial evidence, excessive extension required to the contract, and the risk of further depreciation of the vehicle; decree for delivery is granted and time order refused.
Court Disposition
decree granted for delivery of vehicle; application for time order refused; expenses awarded against defender
Orders
- Order for delivery of vehicle to pursuer
- Warrant for officers of court to take possession if not delivered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment