Pollok v. Workman [1900] ScotLR 37_270 (09 January 1900)
The action was dismissed because the pursuer was only one of several persons entitled to claim damages for the wrongful act, and she neither joined the others as parties nor proved their refusal or inability to join. The principle is that all persons with a claim must sue together in one action to avoid multiple proceedings and inconsistent outcomes.
- Citation
- [1900] ScotLR 37_270
- Parties
- Pursuer: Mrs Margaret Mitchell or Pollok; Defender: Charles Workman, M.D.; Defender: Anderson & Chisholm, solicitors; Defender: The Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corporation, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 09 January 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action for Damages / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Approval of Issues
- Outcome
- action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Title to Sue, Reparation, Wrongful Post Mortem, Joinder of Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Margaret Mitchell or Pollok
Pursuer
Charles Workman, M.D.
Defender
Anderson & Chisholm, solicitors
Defender
The Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corporation, Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Damages / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Approval of Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a single relative may sue alone for damages arising from a wrongful post-mortem dissection when other relatives also have a title to sue.
- 2 Whether all persons with a claim must be joined in one action for damages arising from a single wrongful act.
Ratio Decidendi
The action was dismissed because the pursuer was only one of several persons entitled to claim damages for the wrongful act, and she neither joined the others as parties nor proved their refusal or inability to join. The principle is that all persons with a claim must sue together in one action to avoid multiple proceedings and inconsistent outcomes.
Court Disposition
action dismissed
Orders
- The interlocutor appealed against was recalled.
- The action was dismissed and decree granted accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment