McGibbon v. McAllister [2008] ScotCS CSOH_4 (11 January 2008)
The ordinary reading of 'parent' in the Damages (Scotland) Act 1976 excludes the pursuer, but this exclusion, based solely on marital status, is discriminatory under Articles 8 and 14 ECHR. It is possible and necessary to interpret 'parent' in a Convention-compatible way to include someone who, as a matter of fact, fulfilled the roles usually associated with parenthood. The pursuer's averments are sufficient to allow proof before answer.
- Citation
- [2008] ScotCS CSOH_4
- Parties
- Pursuer: Paul McGibbon; Defender: Graeme McAllister
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (damages for Wrongful Death) / Procedure Roll (preliminary Issue on Title to Sue)
- Outcome
- Proof before answer allowed; action not dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Title to Sue, Definition of Parent, Discrimination Based on Marital Status, Interpretation of Damages (scotland) Act 1976, Application of Human Rights Act 1998, Articles 8 and 14 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul McGibbon
Pursuer
Graeme McAllister
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil (damages for Wrongful Death) / Procedure Roll (preliminary Issue on Title to Sue)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer qualifies as a 'parent' under Schedule 1, paragraph 1(b) of the Damages (Scotland) Act 1976 as amended at the relevant date
- 2 Whether exclusion of the pursuer based on marital status is discriminatory under Articles 8 and 14 ECHR
- 3 Whether the statute can be interpreted compatibly with Convention rights to include the pursuer
Ratio Decidendi
The ordinary reading of 'parent' in the Damages (Scotland) Act 1976 excludes the pursuer, but this exclusion, based solely on marital status, is discriminatory under Articles 8 and 14 ECHR. It is possible and necessary to interpret 'parent' in a Convention-compatible way to include someone who, as a matter of fact, fulfilled the roles usually associated with parenthood. The pursuer's averments are sufficient to allow proof before answer.
Court Disposition
Proof before answer allowed; action not dismissed.
Orders
- Allow proof before answer on the pursuer's title to sue.
- Reserve all questions of expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment