ONESAVINGS BANK PLC AGAINST JOHN BURNS & Anor [2017] ScotSC 20 (05 April 2017)
The assignations relied upon by pursuers omitted mandatory wording required by statute and did not conform as closely as may be to the prescribed form; therefore, the pursuers did not have title to sue and cannot obtain the remedies sought.
- Citation
- [2017] ScotSC 20
- Parties
- Pursuer: ONESAVINGS BANK PLC; First Defender: JOHN BURNS, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS JOHN GRANVILLE BURNS; Second Defender: RHODA JOHAN SKINNER OR BURNS, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS RHONA JOHAN SKINNER OR BURNS
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; pursuers found to have no title to sue.
- Legal Topics
- Title to Sue, Assignation of Standard Securities, Heritable Creditor Remedies, Reasonableness of Ejection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ONESAVINGS BANK PLC
Pursuer
JOHN BURNS, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS JOHN GRANVILLE BURNS
First Defender
RHODA JOHAN SKINNER OR BURNS, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS RHONA JOHAN SKINNER OR BURNS
Second Defender
Procedural Posture
Summary Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pursuers have title to sue under assigned standard security
- 2 Whether assignations conform to statutory requirements
- 3 Whether it is reasonable to grant remedies sought
Ratio Decidendi
The assignations relied upon by pursuers omitted mandatory wording required by statute and did not conform as closely as may be to the prescribed form; therefore, the pursuers did not have title to sue and cannot obtain the remedies sought.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; pursuers found to have no title to sue.
Orders
- Defenders’ first plea in law sustained.
- Application dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment