CLUB LOS CLAVALES AGAINST FIRST NATIONAL TRUSTEE COMPANY LTD [2022] ScotCS CSIH_35 (18 August 2022)
The committee members who were in place prior to the invalid AGMs remain validly in office until retirement at a future AGM; the committee thus has authority to direct litigation and grant discharge to the defenders. The defenders have no basis to challenge the committee's validity or the Club's title to sue. The defenders must demit office as trustee and execute the deed of retirement.
- Citation
- [2022] ScotCS CSIH_35
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: Club Los Claveles; Pursuer and Respondent: Albert Fletcher; Pursuer and Respondent: Roger Lindsay; Pursuer and Respondent: Norma Ann Burston; Defender and Reclaimer: First National Trustee Company Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Inner House, Court of Session, Reclaiming Motion and Cross Appeal
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion refused; cross-appeal allowed (majority); defenders must demit office as trustee.
- Legal Topics
- Title to Sue, Committee Validity, Trustee Retirement, Unincorporated Associations, Interpretation of Constitution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Club Los Claveles
Pursuer and Respondent
Albert Fletcher
Pursuer and Respondent
Roger Lindsay
Pursuer and Respondent
Norma Ann Burston
Pursuer and Respondent
First National Trustee Company Ltd
Defender and Reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Inner House, Court of Session, Reclaiming Motion and Cross Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the committee of Club Los Claveles was validly constituted under the Club's constitution
- 2 Whether the defenders had standing to challenge the committee's validity and title to sue
- 3 Whether the defenders must demit office as trustee and execute a deed of retirement
Ratio Decidendi
The committee members who were in place prior to the invalid AGMs remain validly in office until retirement at a future AGM; the committee thus has authority to direct litigation and grant discharge to the defenders. The defenders have no basis to challenge the committee's validity or the Club's title to sue. The defenders must demit office as trustee and execute the deed of retirement.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion refused; cross-appeal allowed (majority); defenders must demit office as trustee.
Orders
- Defenders to demit office as trustee on terms set out in draft deed of retirement.
- Defenders to hand over register of members to pursuers or new trustees.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment