Millar, Walker, & Millar v. Brodie's Trustees [1902] ScotLR 39_651 (06 June 1902)
The minute of 1st March 1871, recording the appointment of Andrew Millar junior as law-agent and factor with usual remuneration, constituted a written obligation by the trustees to pay the usual professional charges. Therefore, the claim is founded upon a written obligation, and the triennial prescription does not apply.
- Citation
- [1902] ScotLR 39_651
- Parties
- Pursuers: Millar, Walker, & Millar; Thomas Walker; James Millar; Alexander Millar (executor-dative of Andrew Millar junior); Defenders: James H. Dunn and others, trustees of Robert Brodie's trust
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 1902
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; proof allowed
- Legal Topics
- Triennial Prescription, Written Obligation, Law Agent Remuneration, Trustee Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Millar, Walker, & Millar; Thomas Walker; James Millar; Alexander Millar (executor-dative of Andrew Millar junior)
Pursuers
James H. Dunn and others, trustees of Robert Brodie's trust
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the triennial prescription under Act 1579, cap. 83 apply to the account of a law-agent to a trust where the appointment is recorded in a written minute?
- 2 Does the minute of appointment constitute a written obligation sufficient to exclude the triennial prescription?
Ratio Decidendi
The minute of 1st March 1871, recording the appointment of Andrew Millar junior as law-agent and factor with usual remuneration, constituted a written obligation by the trustees to pay the usual professional charges. Therefore, the claim is founded upon a written obligation, and the triennial prescription does not apply.
Court Disposition
interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; proof allowed
Orders
- Recall the interlocutor of 8th March 1902.
- Allow parties a proof of their respective averments.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment