Hemming v. Galbraith [1908] ScotLR 737 (06 June 1908)
It is incompetent under section 142 of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1856 to bring a general action for accounting against a discharged trustee in respect of matters already adjudicated on under section 141, and the pursuer's averments were irrelevant as there was no allegation that the items objected to had not already been investigated.
- Citation
- [1908] ScotLR 737
- Parties
- Pursuer/appellant: Fred Oliver Hemming; Defender/respondent: William Brodie Galbraith
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (bankruptcy/accounting) / Appeal From Sheriff to Court of Session Inner House, First Division
- Outcome
- appeal refused; action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Discharge, Accounting by Trustee, Composition in Bankruptcy, Competency of Action, Relevancy of Averments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fred Oliver Hemming
Pursuer/appellant
William Brodie Galbraith
Defender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (bankruptcy/accounting) / Appeal From Sheriff to Court of Session Inner House, First Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a discharged trustee can be compelled to account at the instance of the bankrupt under section 142 of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1856 after the sequestration has ended and the trustee is discharged
- 2 Whether a general accounting is competent under section 142 for matters already adjudicated on under section 141
- 3 Whether the pursuer's averments were relevant in the absence of specific allegations that the items objected to had not already been investigated
Ratio Decidendi
It is incompetent under section 142 of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1856 to bring a general action for accounting against a discharged trustee in respect of matters already adjudicated on under section 141, and the pursuer's averments were irrelevant as there was no allegation that the items objected to had not already been investigated.
Court Disposition
appeal refused; action dismissed
Orders
- affirmed the interlocutor of the Sheriff
- dismissed the action anew
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment