Appeal in the cause The Accountant in Bankruptcy as Trustee of the Sequestrated Estate of Peter Davies against Krystyna Sieroslawski as Executrix Nominate of the Sequestrated Estate of Peter Davies (Sheriff Appeal Court Civil) [2024] SACCIV 35 (26 July 2024)
The sheriff erred in law by failing to provide a fair hearing, relying on findings unsupported by evidence, considering irrelevant factors, and not admitting affidavit evidence. The interests of the creditors outweigh those of the respondent and her son, given the son's absence and the respondent's long occupation. Authority to sell the property should be granted to the trustee.
- Citation
- [2024] SACCIV 35
- Parties
- Applicant and Appellant: The Accountant in Bankruptcy as Trustee of the Sequestrated Estate of Peter Davies; Defender and Respondent: Krystyna Sieroslawski as Executrix Nominate of the Sequestrated Estate of Peter Davies
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff's Refusal of Summary Application
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Trustee's Power to Sell Heritable Property, Family Home in Sequestration, Statutory Interpretation of Bankruptcy (scotland) Act 1985, Admissibility of Affidavit Evidence, Discretion Under Section 40(2)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Accountant in Bankruptcy as Trustee of the Sequestrated Estate of Peter Davies
Applicant and Appellant
Krystyna Sieroslawski as Executrix Nominate of the Sequestrated Estate of Peter Davies
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff's Refusal of Summary Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff erred in refusing the trustee's application to sell heritable property under section 40(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1985
- 2 Whether the sheriff failed to provide a fair hearing and relied on irrelevant considerations
- 3 Whether the sheriff erred in not considering affidavit evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The sheriff erred in law by failing to provide a fair hearing, relying on findings unsupported by evidence, considering irrelevant factors, and not admitting affidavit evidence. The interests of the creditors outweigh those of the respondent and her son, given the son's absence and the respondent's long occupation. Authority to sell the property should be granted to the trustee.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Respondent sisted as executrix nominate of Mr Davies's estate
- Sheriff's interlocutors of 22 December 2023 and 17 January 2024 recalled
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment