Malloch v Aberdeen Corp [1973] ScotCS CSIH_2 (01 June 1973)
The 1967 amendment to the Schools (Scotland) Code was ultra vires insofar as it purported to require certificated teachers already employed to register, thereby depriving them of vested rights without clear statutory authority. However, Aberdeen Corporation was entitled to dismiss the pursuer as a matter of policy, provided the policy was not unreasonable, arbitrary, or adopted in bad faith.
- Citation
- [1973] ScotCS CSIH_2
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: John Strachan Malloch; First Named Defender: Aberdeen Corporation; Second Named Defender/reclaimer: Secretary of State for Scotland
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 1973
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal/reclaiming Motion
- Outcome
- Declarator granted in favour of pursuer regarding ultra vires amendment; declarator refused regarding dismissal based on policy; case continued for further hearing on interlocutor form.
- Legal Topics
- Ultra Vires, Vested Rights, Teacher Registration, Dismissal at Pleasure, Natural Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Strachan Malloch
Pursuer/respondent
Aberdeen Corporation
First Named Defender
Secretary of State for Scotland
Second Named Defender/reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal/reclaiming Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1967 amendment to the Schools (Scotland) Code was ultra vires in depriving certificated teachers of vested rights without compensation
- 2 Whether Aberdeen Corporation could lawfully dismiss a teacher for failure to register with the General Teaching Council for Scotland
- 3 Whether the Corporation's policy of not employing unregistered teachers was unreasonable or unlawful
Ratio Decidendi
The 1967 amendment to the Schools (Scotland) Code was ultra vires insofar as it purported to require certificated teachers already employed to register, thereby depriving them of vested rights without clear statutory authority. However, Aberdeen Corporation was entitled to dismiss the pursuer as a matter of policy, provided the policy was not unreasonable, arbitrary, or adopted in bad faith.
Court Disposition
Declarator granted in favour of pursuer regarding ultra vires amendment; declarator refused regarding dismissal based on policy; case continued for further hearing on interlocutor form.
Orders
- Declarator that the 1967 amendment was ultra vires as applied to certificated teachers already employed.
- Refusal of declarator that the Corporation could not dismiss the pursuer as a matter of policy.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment