Morgan Guaranty v Lothian RC [1994] ScotCS CSIH_3 (01 December 1994)
Payments made under a contract that is void ab initio due to being ultra vires a local authority are recoverable by the payer under the condictio indebiti, even if the payment was made under a mistake of law. The error of law rule does not form part of Scots law and is overruled. The pursuer is entitled to repetition of the sum paid, subject to equitable considerations, which were not established by the defender in this case.
- Citation
- [1994] ScotCS CSIH_3
- Parties
- Pursuer: Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York; Defender: Lothian Regional Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Inner House, Court of Session (reclaiming Motion)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary recalled; decree granted for the sum sued for; issue of interest remitted to Outer House for further consideration.
- Legal Topics
- Ultra Vires Contracts, Unjust Enrichment, Condictio Indebiti, Mistake of Law, Repetition of Payments, Public Authority Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York
Pursuer
Lothian Regional Council
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Inner House, Court of Session (reclaiming Motion)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether payments made under a void (ultra vires) contract are recoverable by the payer from a local authority under Scots law
- 2 Whether the condictio indebiti is available where the payment was made under a mistake of law, not just fact
- 3 Whether the error of law rule (excluding recovery for mistake of law) forms part of Scots law
Ratio Decidendi
Payments made under a contract that is void ab initio due to being ultra vires a local authority are recoverable by the payer under the condictio indebiti, even if the payment was made under a mistake of law. The error of law rule does not form part of Scots law and is overruled. The pursuer is entitled to repetition of the sum paid, subject to equitable considerations, which were not established by the defender in this case.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary recalled; decree granted for the sum sued for; issue of interest remitted to Outer House for further consideration.
Orders
- Recall of the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor dismissing the action
- Decree de plano for the pursuers for £368,104.52
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment