Wilson v. Jaymarke Estates Ltd & Anor [2005] ScotCS CSIH_84 (25 November 2005)

Wilson v. Jaymarke Estates Ltd & Anor [2005] ScotCS CSIH_84 (25 November 2005)

The court held that the affairs of Jaymarke Estates Ltd were conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to the petitioner, including unauthorised payments, improper management charges, and exclusion from management. The petitioner was entitled to relief under section 461, specifically an order for the purchase of his shares at net asset value without minority discount, as the company operated as a quasi partnership.

Citation
[2005] ScotCS CSIH_84
Parties
Petitioner and Respondent: Alan Baxter Wilson; First Respondent and Appellant: Jaymarke Estates Limited; Second Respondent and Appellant: James Shaw
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
25 November 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Companies Act 1985, Part XVII / Appeal From Sheriff Court Decision
Outcome
appeal refused; sheriff's judgment adhered to
Legal Topics
Unfair Prejudice, Quasi Partnership, Minority Shareholder Protection, Valuation of Shares, Management Charges, Corporate Remedies
Company Law Corporate Governance Unfair Prejudice Quasi Partnership Minority Shareholder Protection Valuation of Shares Management Charges Corporate Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alan Baxter Wilson

Petitioner and Respondent

Jaymarke Estates Limited

First Respondent and Appellant

James Shaw

Second Respondent and Appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under Companies Act 1985, Part XVII / Appeal From Sheriff Court Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the affairs of Jaymarke Estates Ltd were conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to the petitioner
  2. 2 Whether the petitioner was entitled to relief under section 461 of the Companies Act 1985
  3. 3 Appropriate valuation method for petitioner's shares

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the affairs of Jaymarke Estates Ltd were conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to the petitioner, including unauthorised payments, improper management charges, and exclusion from management. The petitioner was entitled to relief under section 461, specifically an order for the purchase of his shares at net asset value without minority discount, as the company operated as a quasi partnership.

Court Disposition

appeal refused; sheriff's judgment adhered to

Orders

  • Order for second respondent to purchase petitioner's shareholding in Jaymarke Estates Ltd at net asset value as at 30 September 1996, without minority discount; management charges to be added back for valuation; Lodestar loan treated as asset