PROCURATOR FISCAL, ELGIN v. CLIVE ARTHUR BURTON [2012] ScotSC 88 (29 August 2012)
The date of service of the complaint, not the police interview, was the official notification of the charge. There was no unreasonable delay or breach of Article 6 ECHR, and no oppression at common law. The devolution minute and plea in bar of trial were dismissed.
- Citation
- [2012] ScotSC 88
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Procurator Fiscal, Elgin; Accused: Clive Arthur Burton
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Summary Prosecution / Preliminary Plea and Devolution Minute
- Outcome
- Devolution minute and plea in bar of trial dismissed; accused to plead.
- Legal Topics
- Unreasonable Delay, Article 6 ECHR, Right to Fair Trial, Forensic Evidence, Plea in Bar of Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Procurator Fiscal, Elgin
Prosecutor
Clive Arthur Burton
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Summary Prosecution / Preliminary Plea and Devolution Minute
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether delay in prosecution breached accused's Article 6 ECHR rights
- 2 Whether the starting point for Article 6 time calculation is police interview or service of complaint
- 3 Whether delay amounted to oppression at common law
Ratio Decidendi
The date of service of the complaint, not the police interview, was the official notification of the charge. There was no unreasonable delay or breach of Article 6 ECHR, and no oppression at common law. The devolution minute and plea in bar of trial were dismissed.
Court Disposition
Devolution minute and plea in bar of trial dismissed; accused to plead.
Orders
- Common law plea in bar of trial repelled
- Devolution minute dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment