Grant and Another (Taylor's Executrices) v. Thom and Others [1913] ScotLR 55 (21 November 1913)
The lack of subscription on the holograph testamentary writing is fatal to its validity under Scots law. The presence of the testator's name and the words 'My last will' at the beginning of the document does not amount to subscription or its equivalent. Established legal doctrine requires strict compliance with the requirement of subscription, and neither facts and circumstances nor preliminary statements can cure the defect. Therefore, the document cannot be given effect as a valid will.
- Citation
- [1913] ScotLR 55
- Parties
- Pursuer: Mrs Elsie Grant and another (Taylor's Executrices); Defender: Robert Taylor Thom and others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 1913
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House, First Division
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute affirmed; decree of declarator refused.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Holograph Wills, Requirement of Subscription for Testamentary Writings, Adoption and Identification of Testamentary Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Elsie Grant and another (Taylor's Executrices)
Pursuer
Robert Taylor Thom and others
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House, First Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an unsubscribed holograph document, found in the deceased's possession and purporting to dispose of her estate, can be given effect as a valid will under Scots law.
- 2 Whether the presence of the testator's name and the words 'My last will' at the beginning of the document is equivalent to subscription.
Ratio Decidendi
The lack of subscription on the holograph testamentary writing is fatal to its validity under Scots law. The presence of the testator's name and the words 'My last will' at the beginning of the document does not amount to subscription or its equivalent. Established legal doctrine requires strict compliance with the requirement of subscription, and neither facts and circumstances nor preliminary statements can cure the defect. Therefore, the document cannot be given effect as a valid will.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute affirmed; decree of declarator refused.
Orders
- Dismiss the appeal.
- Affirm the interlocutor of the Sheriff-Substitute dated 12th July 1913.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment