Ritchie and Another (Banks' Trustees) v. Banks'Trustees and Others [1906] ScotLR 44_121 (29 November 1906)
Vesting of William Addison Banks' share was postponed until the death or remarriage of the widow; William did not acquire a vested right. Frances Isobel Banks, as issue of William, is substituted to her father's share but vesting is postponed until the widow's death or remarriage, not to Frances' attainment of majority. Frances is entitled to the one-tenth share of income accruing after her father's death. The share of income does not accresce to surviving children nor to William's trustees.
- Citation
- [1906] ScotLR 44_121
- Parties
- First Parties: Charles Ritchie and another (Alexander Banks' trustees); Second Parties: Trustees of William Addison Banks; Third Parties: Tutors of Frances Isobel Banks
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 1906
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- special case determined; interlocutor pronounced
- Legal Topics
- Vesting of Interests, Gift to Children, Survivorship Clause, Income Distribution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Ritchie and another (Alexander Banks' trustees)
First Parties
Trustees of William Addison Banks
Second Parties
Tutors of Frances Isobel Banks
Third Parties
Procedural Posture
Special Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the share of residue destined to William Addison Banks vest in him?
- 2 Did the said share vest in Frances Isobel Banks on her father's death?
- 3 Is vesting postponed until the death or remarriage of the widow or until Frances attains majority?
Ratio Decidendi
Vesting of William Addison Banks' share was postponed until the death or remarriage of the widow; William did not acquire a vested right. Frances Isobel Banks, as issue of William, is substituted to her father's share but vesting is postponed until the widow's death or remarriage, not to Frances' attainment of majority. Frances is entitled to the one-tenth share of income accruing after her father's death. The share of income does not accresce to surviving children nor to William's trustees.
Court Disposition
special case determined; interlocutor pronounced
Orders
- Answer first and second questions in the negative.
- Answer branch (a) of third question in the affirmative; branches (b) and (c) in the negative.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment