MICHAEL GORRIE v. THE MARIST BROTHERS [2001] ScotSC 22 (26th November, 2001)
The Minute of Amendment is allowed as it constitutes a reformulation, not a fundamental change, of the pursuer's case. The Marist Brothers are properly convened as defenders in their descriptive name as an unincorporated association. The pursuer has pled a relevant case for the application of section 19A, and a preliminary proof is required to determine whether it is equitable to allow the action to proceed. Certain averments are excluded from probation as irrelevant or hearsay.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotSC 22
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: Michael Gorrie; Defenders and Appellants: The Marist Brothers
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (personal Injury, Negligence, Limitation) / Interlocutory Appeal on Amendment, Relevancy, and Time Bar
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; amendment permitted; certain averments excluded from probation; otherwise, proof before answer on time-bar and equity under section 19A reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Vicarious Liability, Negligence, Sexual Abuse, Unincorporated Associations, Limitation of Actions, Amendment of Pleadings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Gorrie
Pursuer and Respondent
The Marist Brothers
Defenders and Appellants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (personal Injury, Negligence, Limitation) / Interlocutory Appeal on Amendment, Relevancy, and Time Bar
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer may amend pleadings to introduce vicarious liability after expiry of limitation period
- 2 Whether the Marist Brothers are properly convened as defenders as an unincorporated association
- 3 Whether the pursuer's claim is time-barred and if it is equitable to allow it to proceed under section 19A of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973
Ratio Decidendi
The Minute of Amendment is allowed as it constitutes a reformulation, not a fundamental change, of the pursuer's case. The Marist Brothers are properly convened as defenders in their descriptive name as an unincorporated association. The pursuer has pled a relevant case for the application of section 19A, and a preliminary proof is required to determine whether it is equitable to allow the action to proceed. Certain averments are excluded from probation as irrelevant or hearsay.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; amendment permitted; certain averments excluded from probation; otherwise, proof before answer on time-bar and equity under section 19A reserved.
Orders
- Record to be opened up and amended in terms of the Minute of Amendment and Answers as adjusted.
- Record thereafter closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment