Smart & Co. v. Stewart [1911] ScotLR 595 (10 March 1911)

Smart & Co. v. Stewart [1911] ScotLR 595 (10 March 1911)

The defender, knowing of the firm's insolvency, illegally took possession of its business, plant, and stock to the prejudice of other creditors. He is bound to restore the value of the estate (including goodwill) for the benefit of all creditors. Subsequent diligence did not validate his title. The value to be consigned is limited to the value of the assets taken, not the full amount of the pursuer's debt, as the assets were valued and the sum is less than the debt.

Citation
[1911] ScotLR 595
Parties
Pursuer: J. Smart & Company; Defender: George Deans Stewart (trading as Stewart & Company); Trustee (not Appearing): A. Lawrie Kennaway, W.S.
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
10 March 1911
Procedural Posture
Civil (action for Restitution/damages in Bankruptcy Context) / Inner House Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor After Proof
Outcome
Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to in so far as it ordered consignation of £156, 19s. 6d. with interest; recalled quoad ultra; cause remitted for further procedure.
Legal Topics
Vicious Intromission, Creditor Rights, Restitution, Goodwill Valuation, Preferential Treatment of Creditors
Bankruptcy Insolvency Commercial Law Vicious Intromission Creditor Rights Restitution Goodwill Valuation Preferential Treatment of Creditors

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J. Smart & Company

Pursuer

George Deans Stewart (trading as Stewart & Company)

Defender

A. Lawrie Kennaway, W.S.

Trustee (not Appearing)

Procedural Posture

Civil (action for Restitution/damages in Bankruptcy Context) / Inner House Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor After Proof

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defender, as a creditor, illegally took possession of the insolvent firm's business and assets to the prejudice of other creditors
  2. 2 Whether the defender is liable to restore the value of the estate or pay the pursuer's debt
  3. 3 Whether subsequent diligence (sequestration, poinding) cured the initial illegality

Ratio Decidendi

The defender, knowing of the firm's insolvency, illegally took possession of its business, plant, and stock to the prejudice of other creditors. He is bound to restore the value of the estate (including goodwill) for the benefit of all creditors. Subsequent diligence did not validate his title. The value to be consigned is limited to the value of the assets taken, not the full amount of the pursuer's debt, as the assets were valued and the sum is less than the debt.

Court Disposition

Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to in so far as it ordered consignation of £156, 19s. 6d. with interest; recalled quoad ultra; cause remitted for further procedure.

Orders

  • Defender to consign £156, 19s. 6d. with interest at 5% from 17 October 1908 in bank for benefit of creditors.
  • Further procedure remitted to Lord Ordinary.