Ballingall & Son, Ltd v. Dundee Ice and Cold Storage Co., Ltd [1924] ScotLR 171 (18 January 1924)

Ballingall & Son, Ltd v. Dundee Ice and Cold Storage Co., Ltd [1924] ScotLR 171 (18 January 1924)

The majority held that the exemption clause, when read as a whole, was clear, unambiguous, and effective to exclude the defenders' liability for all loss or damage except theft, regardless of negligence. The clause was not self-contradictory or ambiguous, and thus the defenders were not liable at common law.

Citation
[1924] ScotLR 171
Parties
Pursuer: Ballingall & Son, Limited; Defender: Dundee Ice and Cold Storage Company, Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
18 January 1924
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Note) From Lord Ordinary's Dismissal of Action
Outcome
appeal dismissed; action dismissed as irrelevant
Legal Topics
Warehouseman Liability, Exemption Clauses, Negligence, Construction of Contracts
Contract Law Commercial Law Warehouseman Liability Exemption Clauses Negligence Construction of Contracts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ballingall & Son, Limited

Pursuer

Dundee Ice and Cold Storage Company, Limited

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Note) From Lord Ordinary's Dismissal of Action

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the exemption clause in the storage contract validly excludes the warehouseman's common law liability for negligence
  2. 2 Whether the clause is ambiguous or self-contradictory and thus ineffective

Ratio Decidendi

The majority held that the exemption clause, when read as a whole, was clear, unambiguous, and effective to exclude the defenders' liability for all loss or damage except theft, regardless of negligence. The clause was not self-contradictory or ambiguous, and thus the defenders were not liable at common law.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; action dismissed as irrelevant

Orders

  • Reclaiming note refused
  • Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary affirmed