Dick v Procurator Fiscal, Dumfries [2016] ScotHC HCJAC_62 (15 July 2016)

Dick v Procurator Fiscal, Dumfries [2016] ScotHC HCJAC_62 (15 July 2016)

The sheriff was entitled to accept the identification evidence of the eyewitnesses and reject the alibi evidence, having provided adequate reasons for his findings. The sheriff's assessment of credibility and reliability, including the timing evidence and the provenance of the course schedule, was within his discretion. The appeal is refused as the sheriff's findings were supported by evidence and adequately reasoned.

Citation
[2016] ScotHC HCJAC_62
Parties
Appellant: William Dick; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Dumfries
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
15 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (by Stated Case) / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal refused
Legal Topics
Alibi, Identification Evidence, Standard of Proof, Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, Credibility and Reliability of Witnesses
Criminal Law Wildlife Law Alibi Identification Evidence Standard of Proof Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 Credibility and Reliability of Witnesses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Dick

Appellant

Procurator Fiscal, Dumfries

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal (by Stated Case) / Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sheriff provided adequate reasons for accepting identification evidence and rejecting the alibi
  2. 2 Whether the sheriff's findings-in-fact were supported by evidence
  3. 3 Whether the sheriff erred in assessing credibility and reliability of witnesses

Ratio Decidendi

The sheriff was entitled to accept the identification evidence of the eyewitnesses and reject the alibi evidence, having provided adequate reasons for his findings. The sheriff's assessment of credibility and reliability, including the timing evidence and the provenance of the course schedule, was within his discretion. The appeal is refused as the sheriff's findings were supported by evidence and adequately reasoned.

Court Disposition

Appeal refused

Orders

  • The three questions in the stated case answered in the affirmative.
  • Conviction and sentence affirmed.