Spence v. William Baird & Co., Ltd [1912] ScotLR 278 (13 January 1912)
The arbiter was entitled to find that the appellant had not proved an accident within the meaning of the statute, as there was no evidence that the lifting of the hutch accelerated or aggravated the pre-existing heart disease; the incapacity resulted from the natural progression of the disease, not from an accident...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1912] ScotLR 278
- Parties
- Appellant: William Spence; Respondent: William Baird & Company, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 1912
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Arbitration (sheriff Court) / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Accident Arising Out of Employment, Aggravation of Pre Existing Disease
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Spence
Appellant
William Baird & Company, Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Arbitration (sheriff Court) / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant suffered an accident arising out of and in the course of employment within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906
- 2 Whether the lifting of the hutch aggravated or accelerated the appellant's pre-existing heart disease
Ratio Decidendi
The arbiter was entitled to find that the appellant had not proved an accident within the meaning of the statute, as there was no evidence that the lifting of the hutch accelerated or aggravated the pre-existing heart disease; the incapacity resulted from the natural progression of the disease, not from an accident arising out of employment.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed; the finding of the Sheriff-Substitute is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment