WILLIAM WARWICK v. PROCURATOR FISCAL, DUMFRIES [2016] ScotSAC Crim 13 (5 April 2016)

WILLIAM WARWICK v. PROCURATOR FISCAL, DUMFRIES [2016] ScotSAC Crim 13 (5 April 2016)

The court held that the sheriff had not erred in law in refusing bail, as the reasons provided were sufficient and justified by the circumstances of the case.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] ScotSAC Crim 13
Parties
Appellant: William Warwick; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Dumfries
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
05 April 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Bail, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Bail Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Warwick

Appellant

Procurator Fiscal, Dumfries

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the sheriff erred in refusing bail to the appellant

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the sheriff had not erred in law in refusing bail, as the reasons provided were sufficient and justified by the circumstances of the case.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • bail refused
  • appellant to remain in custody