WILLIAM WARWICK v. PROCURATOR FISCAL, DUMFRIES [2016] ScotSAC Crim 13 (5 April 2016)
The court held that the sheriff had not erred in law in refusing bail, as the reasons provided were sufficient and justified by the circumstances of the case.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] ScotSAC Crim 13
- Parties
- Appellant: William Warwick; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Dumfries
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Appeal Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Warwick
Appellant
Procurator Fiscal, Dumfries
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff erred in refusing bail to the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the sheriff had not erred in law in refusing bail, as the reasons provided were sufficient and justified by the circumstances of the case.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- bail refused
- appellant to remain in custody
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] Sheriff Appeal Court (Criminal) Opinions You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Sheriff Appeal Court (Criminal) Opinions >> WILLIAM WARWICK v. PROCURATOR FISCAL, DUMFRIES [2016] ScotSAC Crim 13 (5 April 2016) URL: https://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotSAC/Crim/2016/13.html Cite as: 2016 SCCR 261, [2016] ScotSAC Crim 13 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] WILLIAM WARWICK v. PROCURATOR FISCAL, DUMFRIES [2016] ScotSAC Crim 13 (5 April 2016) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 13.pdf BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotSAC/Crim/2016/13.html