Cammick v. The Glasgow Iron and Steel Co., Ltd [1901] ScotLR 39_138 (26 November 1901)
The Court held that the Sheriff's function in registering a memorandum of agreement under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 is ministerial and administrative, not judicial. If the genuineness of the memorandum is established, the Sheriff is bound to grant registration without inquiry into whether the employer remains liable. Any dispute as to ongoing liability must be addressed by application for review or rectification, not by opposing registration. The appeal was dismissed as either incompetent or, if competent, without merit.
- Citation
- [1901] ScotLR 39_138
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: William Cammick; Defender/appellant: The Glasgow Iron and Steel Company, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 1901
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff to Court of Session Inner House Second Division
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Registration of Memorandum of Agreement, Competency of Appeal, Ministerial Acts Vs Judicial Acts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Cammick
Pursuer/respondent
The Glasgow Iron and Steel Company, Limited
Defender/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff to Court of Session Inner House Second Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal to the Court of Session is competent from a Sheriff's decision to grant a warrant to register a memorandum of agreement under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897
- 2 Whether the Sheriff is bound to grant warrant for registration if satisfied as to the genuineness of the memorandum, regardless of subsequent events affecting liability
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the Sheriff's function in registering a memorandum of agreement under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 is ministerial and administrative, not judicial. If the genuineness of the memorandum is established, the Sheriff is bound to grant registration without inquiry into whether the employer remains liable. Any dispute as to ongoing liability must be addressed by application for review or rectification, not by opposing registration. The appeal was dismissed as either incompetent or, if competent, without merit.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- affirmed the interlocutors appealed against
- repelled the defences
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment