Brown v. J. & J. Cunningham, Ltd [1904] ScotLR 41_835 (16 July 1904)

Brown v. J. & J. Cunningham, Ltd [1904] ScotLR 41_835 (16 July 1904)

Where a workman is engaged at a fixed weekly wage and works a full week, the fixed wage is the proper basis for calculating compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897, regardless of any part-week worked prior to the full week.

Citation
[1904] ScotLR 41_835
Parties
Pursuer and Respondent: William Brown; Defenders and Appellants: J. & J. Cunningham, Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
16 July 1904
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Arbitration (stated Case) / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed; award of compensation affirmed
Legal Topics
Workmen's Compensation, Average Weekly Earnings, Fixed Wage Contracts, Employer's Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Brown

Pursuer and Respondent

J. & J. Cunningham, Limited

Defenders and Appellants

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Arbitration (stated Case) / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 How should average weekly earnings be calculated under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 when a workman is employed on a fixed weekly wage but has worked only part of a preceding week?
  2. 2 Does a single day worked in a prior week require averaging over two weeks for compensation calculation?

Ratio Decidendi

Where a workman is engaged at a fixed weekly wage and works a full week, the fixed wage is the proper basis for calculating compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897, regardless of any part-week worked prior to the full week.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; award of compensation affirmed

Orders

  • Defenders and appellants to pay compensation to pursuer and respondent at 10s. per week, beginning 17th March 1904, and weekly thereafter.