Brown v. J. & J. Cunningham, Ltd [1904] ScotLR 41_835 (16 July 1904)
Where a workman is engaged at a fixed weekly wage and works a full week, the fixed wage is the proper basis for calculating compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897, regardless of any part-week worked prior to the full week.
- Citation
- [1904] ScotLR 41_835
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: William Brown; Defenders and Appellants: J. & J. Cunningham, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 1904
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Arbitration (stated Case) / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; award of compensation affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Average Weekly Earnings, Fixed Wage Contracts, Employer's Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Brown
Pursuer and Respondent
J. & J. Cunningham, Limited
Defenders and Appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Arbitration (stated Case) / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 How should average weekly earnings be calculated under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 when a workman is employed on a fixed weekly wage but has worked only part of a preceding week?
- 2 Does a single day worked in a prior week require averaging over two weeks for compensation calculation?
Ratio Decidendi
Where a workman is engaged at a fixed weekly wage and works a full week, the fixed wage is the proper basis for calculating compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897, regardless of any part-week worked prior to the full week.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; award of compensation affirmed
Orders
- Defenders and appellants to pay compensation to pursuer and respondent at 10s. per week, beginning 17th March 1904, and weekly thereafter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment