Kelly v. North British Railway Co. [1915] ScotLR 53 (28 October 1915)
Payments made by the employer to the workman under an agreement that they are without prejudice to claims against third parties and subject to repayment if damages are recovered are not 'compensation' under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906, and do not bar the workman from pursuing an action for damages against the third party.
- Citation
- [1915] ScotLR 53
- Parties
- Pursuer: Patrick Kelly; Defender: North British Railway Company
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 1915
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Master and Servant, Bar to Action, Reparation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Kelly
Pursuer
North British Railway Company
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether receipt of compensation by a workman under reservation of claims against third parties bars an action for damages against such third parties under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906, section 6(1)
Ratio Decidendi
Payments made by the employer to the workman under an agreement that they are without prejudice to claims against third parties and subject to repayment if damages are recovered are not 'compensation' under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906, and do not bar the workman from pursuing an action for damages against the third party.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to
Orders
- The action is allowed to proceed; the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor is adhered to.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment