Park v. David Macbrayne Ltd [1910] ScotLR 315 (22 January 1910)
Because the pursuer's own averments show the arrest was carried out by ship's officers acting under the captain's orders, the occasion is privileged, and the issue for trial must require proof that the arrest was malicious and without probable cause.
- Citation
- [1910] ScotLR 315
- Parties
- Pursuer: George Park; Defender: David MacBrayne Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (reparation/damages) / Interlocutory (motion to Vary Issue Before Trial)
- Outcome
- motion refused
- Legal Topics
- Wrongful Arrest, Privilege of Ship Officers, Malice and Want of Probable Cause, Merchant Shipping Act 1894
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Park
Pursuer
David MacBrayne Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil (reparation/damages) / Interlocutory (motion to Vary Issue Before Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the issue for trial should require proof that the arrest was 'maliciously and without probable cause' given the privilege of ship officers acting under the captain's orders.
- 2 Whether the pursuer's averments disclose a privileged occasion requiring malice and want of probable cause to be pled.
Ratio Decidendi
Because the pursuer's own averments show the arrest was carried out by ship's officers acting under the captain's orders, the occasion is privileged, and the issue for trial must require proof that the arrest was malicious and without probable cause.
Court Disposition
motion refused
Orders
- The Court refused the pursuer's motion to delete 'maliciously and without probable cause' from the issue. The issue as approved by the Lord Ordinary stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment