John Macdonald Ltd v. Lord Blythswood [1914] ScotLR 836 (16 July 1914)
Damages for wrongful use of interdict are not recoverable unless the pursuer can show that the interdict invaded a legal right. As the pursuers had no legal right to the land from which they were interdicted, no civil wrong was done to them and their claim for damages fails.
- Citation
- [1914] ScotLR 836
- Parties
- Pursuer: John Macdonald Limited; Defender: Lord Blythswood
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 1914
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Allowance of Proof Before Answer
- Outcome
- action dismissed as irrelevant
- Legal Topics
- Wrongful Use of Interdict, Damages, Title to Sue, Reparation, Interdict, Statutory Tenancy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Macdonald Limited
Pursuer
Lord Blythswood
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Allowance of Proof Before Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether damages are recoverable for wrongful use of interdict where the pursuer had no legal right to the subject matter affected by the interdict.
- 2 Whether the pursuer suffered a civil wrong by being interdicted from land to which they had no title.
Ratio Decidendi
Damages for wrongful use of interdict are not recoverable unless the pursuer can show that the interdict invaded a legal right. As the pursuers had no legal right to the land from which they were interdicted, no civil wrong was done to them and their claim for damages fails.
Court Disposition
action dismissed as irrelevant
Orders
- Interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary recalled.
- Action dismissed as irrelevant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment