R vs Farad Ahmed Jama and others (Criminal Side No: 16 of 2012) [2012] SCSC 60 (5 November 2012)
The court found that the accused, acting with common intention, committed illegal acts of violence for private ends against the MV Sunshine and the Al Molai, and voluntarily participated in the operation of a pirate ship, with evidence establishing all elements of the offences beyond reasonable doubt. The defence arguments were rejected as lacking merit, and both direct and circumstantial evidence supported conviction on all counts.
- Citation
- [2012] SCSC 60
- Parties
- Prosecution: Republic; Accused: Farad Ahmed Jama; Accused: Muhamud Mohed Hassan; Accused: Saed Hussain Said; Accused: Mohamed Dahir Omar; Accused: Abdulahi Ibrahim Roble; Accused: Faisal Ahmed Omar; Accused: Mohamed Abshir Jama; Accused: Mustafa Bashir Aip; Accused: Hayan Omar Sabriye; Accused: Mohamed Mohamed Omar; Accused: Saed Mohamud Ahmed; Accused: Abdirhamen Adam Abdirhamen; Accused: Ahmed Mohed Ismail; Accused: Said Mohamud Abdirzak; Accused: Bashir Bootan Meheid
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 5 November 2012
- Case Number
- Criminal Side No: 16 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment and Sentencing
- Outcome
- Conviction on all counts; sentences imposed.
- Legal Topics
- Piracy, Jurisdiction, Common Intention, Sentencing, Use of Juveniles in Crime
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Prosecution
Farad Ahmed Jama
Accused
Muhamud Mohed Hassan
Accused
Saed Hussain Said
Accused
Mohamed Dahir Omar
Accused
Abdulahi Ibrahim Roble
Accused
Faisal Ahmed Omar
Accused
Mohamed Abshir Jama
Accused
Mustafa Bashir Aip
Accused
Hayan Omar Sabriye
Accused
Mohamed Mohamed Omar
Accused
Saed Mohamud Ahmed
Accused
Abdirhamen Adam Abdirhamen
Accused
Ahmed Mohed Ismail
Accused
Said Mohamud Abdirzak
Accused
Bashir Bootan Meheid
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused committed acts of piracy under Seychelles law
- 2 Whether the accused acted with common intention
- 3 Whether the evidence supports conviction on all counts
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused, acting with common intention, committed illegal acts of violence for private ends against the MV Sunshine and the Al Molai, and voluntarily participated in the operation of a pirate ship, with evidence establishing all elements of the offences beyond reasonable doubt. The defence arguments were rejected as lacking merit, and both direct and circumstantial evidence supported conviction on all counts.
Court Disposition
Conviction on all counts; sentences imposed.
Orders
- Each adult accused sentenced to 12 years imprisonment on count 1, 18 years on count 2, and 18 years on count 3, to run concurrently.
- Each juvenile accused sentenced to 3 years imprisonment on count 1, 4 years on count 2, and 4 years on count 3, to run concurrently.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment