Durup & Ors v Brassel & Anor (5 of 2012) [2013] SCCC 6 (28 May 2013)
- Citation
- [2013] SCCC 6
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Court
- Constitutional Court
- Posture
- Constitutional Reference / Judgment
- Case number
- 5 of 2012
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Constitutional Court
- Posture
- Constitutional Reference / Judgment
- Case number
- 5 of 2012
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Article 913 of the Civil Code of Seychelles is not unconstitutional; any changes to the law of succession should be addressed by the legislature.
Court disposition
Petition dismissed
02
Material facts
Parties
Achilla Durup
Plaintiff Counsel: Basil HoareauJosette Oshen
Plaintiff Counsel: Basil HoareauMarie Luce Georges
Plaintiff Counsel: Basil HoareauHubert Savy
Plaintiff Counsel: Basil HoareauJosepha Brassel
Defendant Counsel: Pesi PardiwallaJames Savy
Defendant03
Procedural history
Posture
Constitutional Reference / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether article 913 of the Civil Code of Seychelles is unconstitutional
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of article 913 of the Civil Code of Seychelles, arguing it contravenes constitutional provisions.
- Respondent
- The first defendant, through counsel, argued that article 913 is not unconstitutional and that any changes to the law of succession should be addressed by the legislature, not the court.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Judgment of Robinson, J. and concurrence by Egonda-Ntende, CJ
Judicial review of legislation for constitutionality is limited; legislative changes are the province of Parliament.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Article 913 of the Civil Code of Seychelles is not unconstitutional; any changes to the law of succession should be addressed by the legislature.
Obiter and limits
- The revision of the Civil Code and changes to the law of succession are more appropriately matters for the legislature rather than constitutional adjudication.
Court disposition
Petition dismissed
Source and reliance status
Constitutional Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Constitutional Court
Judgment
THE REPUBLIC OF SEYCHELLES
IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SEYCHELLES [Before: Egonda-Ntende, CJ., Burhan and Robinson, JJ] CONSTITUTIONAL CASE NO. 05 OF 2011 [Arising from Supreme Court Civil Suit No. 113 of 2011] Achilla Durup==============================================1st Plaintiff Josette Oshen==============================================2nd Plaintiff Marie Luce Georges=========================================3rd Plaintiff Hubert Savy===============================================4th Plaintiff Versus Josepha Brassel=============================================1st Defendant James Savy================================================2nd Defendant ON REFERENCE MADE UNDER ARTICLE 46 (7) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE
REPUBLIC OF SEYCHELLES Heard: 26th March 2013 Counsel: Basil Hoareau for the Plaintiffs Pesi Pardiwalla for Defendant No.1 Alexandra Madeleine, Assistant Principal State Counsel, for the Attorney General Delivered: 28th May 2013 Egonda-Ntende, CJ [1] I have had the opportunity to read in draft the Judgment of my sister, Robinson, J. I agree that the impugned provision, article 913 of the Civil Code of Seychelles is not unconstitutional for the reasons set out in her judgment. [2] I wish to add that the changes that Mr Pesi Pardiwalla pressed upon this court with regard to the law of succession should be best considered in the current exercise of revision of the Civil Code of Seychelles and be placed before the legislature for a decision. In my view it is more aptly within the province of the legislature than that of constitutional adjudication. Signed, dated and delivered at Victoria this 28th day of May 2013 FMS Egonda-Ntende Chief Justice
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.