Seychelles Judgment

Constitutional Court

Durup & Ors v Brassel & Anor (5 of 2012) [2013] SCCC 6 (28 May 2013)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Article 913 of the Civil Code of Seychelles is not unconstitutional; any changes to the law of succession should be addressed by the legislature.

Court disposition

Petition dismissed

02

Material facts

Parties

Achilla Durup

Plaintiff Counsel: Basil Hoareau

Josette Oshen

Plaintiff Counsel: Basil Hoareau

Marie Luce Georges

Plaintiff Counsel: Basil Hoareau

Hubert Savy

Plaintiff Counsel: Basil Hoareau

Josepha Brassel

Defendant Counsel: Pesi Pardiwalla

James Savy

Defendant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Constitutional Reference / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether article 913 of the Civil Code of Seychelles is unconstitutional

Party arguments

Applicant
The plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of article 913 of the Civil Code of Seychelles, arguing it contravenes constitutional provisions.
Respondent
The first defendant, through counsel, argued that article 913 is not unconstitutional and that any changes to the law of succession should be addressed by the legislature, not the court.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Judgment of Robinson, J. and concurrence by Egonda-Ntende, CJ

    Judicial review of legislation for constitutionality is limited; legislative changes are the province of Parliament.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Article 913 of the Civil Code of Seychelles is not unconstitutional; any changes to the law of succession should be addressed by the legislature.

Obiter and limits

  • The revision of the Civil Code and changes to the law of succession are more appropriately matters for the legislature rather than constitutional adjudication.

Court disposition

Petition dismissed

Source and reliance status

Constitutional Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Constitutional Court

Judgment

[2013] SCCC 6

THE REPUBLIC OF SEYCHELLES

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SEYCHELLES [Before: Egonda-Ntende, CJ., Burhan and Robinson, JJ] CONSTITUTIONAL CASE NO. 05 OF 2011 [Arising from Supreme Court Civil Suit No. 113 of 2011] Achilla Durup==============================================1st Plaintiff Josette Oshen==============================================2nd Plaintiff Marie Luce Georges=========================================3rd Plaintiff Hubert Savy===============================================4th Plaintiff Versus Josepha Brassel=============================================1st Defendant James Savy================================================2nd Defendant ON REFERENCE MADE UNDER ARTICLE 46 (7) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE

REPUBLIC OF SEYCHELLES Heard: 26th March 2013 Counsel: Basil Hoareau for the Plaintiffs Pesi Pardiwalla for Defendant No.1 Alexandra Madeleine, Assistant Principal State Counsel, for the Attorney General Delivered: 28th May 2013 Egonda-Ntende, CJ [1] I have had the opportunity to read in draft the Judgment of my sister, Robinson, J. I agree that the impugned provision, article 913 of the Civil Code of Seychelles is not unconstitutional for the reasons set out in her judgment. [2] I wish to add that the changes that Mr Pesi Pardiwalla pressed upon this court with regard to the law of succession should be best considered in the current exercise of revision of the Civil Code of Seychelles and be placed before the legislature for a decision. In my view it is more aptly within the province of the legislature than that of constitutional adjudication. Signed, dated and delivered at Victoria this 28th day of May 2013 FMS Egonda-Ntende Chief Justice

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Article 913 of the Civil Code of Seychelles

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Article 46(7) of the Constitution of the Republic of Seychelles

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.